The Environmental Working Group submits comments to the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation and Risk Management Agency of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, urging the agency to reform the prevented planting provision of the federal Crop Insurance Program by making the “1 in 4” requirement more stringent, limiting the number of consecutive years in which farmers can receive a prevented planting payment, and not reinstating the 10 percent additional “buy up” coverage for prevented planting.
Related News
Continue Reading
New study: Neonic pesticides found in semen and urine, linked to lower sperm concentration
Neonicotinoid insecticides, notorious for their role in the collapse of bee populations, are turning up in human semen and may be linked to lower sperm count, a new peer-reviewed study finds.
Researche...
Atrazine taints tap water for millions – California says it causes cancer. EPA’s plan won’t fix it.
Three recent developments underscore the health threat posed by atrazine, one of the most widely used herbicides in the U.S.
Earlier this month, California’s environmental health agency said it...
What California’s paraquat phaseout means for your state
When California regulators asked the pesticide industry for more information about the toxic chemical paraquat, the companies abandoned the state instead of providing the data.
It’s a telling sign that...
Should ‘city slickers’ receive farm subsidies?
Farm subsidies should go only to people living or working on a farm.
That’s what Senate Agriculture Committee members Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Peter Welch (D-Vt.) agreed on when the panel debated...