A California Superior Court judge has overturned a ruling requiring tuna companies to brand their cans with mercury warning labels under the state's Prop 65 legislation. Prop 65 requires that products that may cause cancer or reproductive harm carry warning labels, but the judge decided that mercury in tuna doesn't qualify, despite tuna's popularity and the clear threat mercury poses to the development of fetuses, infants and children. Read why at the LA Times.
Related News
Continue Reading
Safe food depends on the states
The recent outbreak of cyclosporiasis, a food-borne illness, has shown we can’t count on the federal government to make sure our food is safe.
States have always played a central role in the safety of...
Dirty Dozen™ food chemicals: Propyl gallate
EWG’s recommendation
Avoid or limit foods containing propyl gallate.
Propyl gallate is a preservative that has been linked to oxidative stress, which is when reactive molecules build up and damage cells...
Dirty Dozen™ food chemicals: BHT
EWG’s recommendation
Avoid or limit foods containing BHT.
BHT has not been formally classified as a carcinogen, but studies have linked it to tumor promotion in animals. BHT and its breakdown products...
Dirty Dozen™ food chemicals: BHA
EWG’s recommendation
Avoid or limit foods containing BHA.
BHA has been classified as a possible carcinogen, or cancer-causing chemical. Studies have shown BHA to produce oxidative stress, which occurs...